Tools play a critical role in understanding the management, monitoring, and measurement of technical debt in real-world situations. We invite researchers, practitioners, and organizations to showcase new techniques, methods, and tools that can aid practitioners and decision-makers in these critical tasks to participate in TechDebt 2022. Technical debt is a metaphor that software developers and managers increasingly use to communicate key trade-offs between time to market and quality issues.
While other software engineering disciplines—such as software maintenance and evolution, refactoring, software quality, and empirical software engineering—have produced results relevant to managing technical debt, none of them alone suffice to model, manage, and communicate the different facets of the design trade-off problems involved in managing technical debt. Similarly, while many software engineering practices can be used to get ahead of technical debt, organizations struggle with managing technical debt routinely and strategically.
Accepted Tool Papers
Call For Tool Papers
Tools play a critical role in understanding the management, monitoring, and measurement of technical debt in real-world situations. We invite researchers, practitioners, and organizations to showcase new techniques, methods, and tools that can aid practitioners and decision-makers in these critical tasks to participate in TechDebt 2022. Technical debt is a metaphor that software developers and managers increasingly use to communicate key trade-offs between time to market and quality issues.
While other software engineering disciplines—such as software maintenance and evolution, refactoring, software quality, and empirical software engineering—have produced results relevant to managing technical debt, none of them alone suffice to model, manage, and communicate the different facets of the design trade-off problems involved in managing technical debt. Similarly, while many software engineering practices can be used to get ahead of technical debt, organizations struggle with managing technical debt routinely and strategically.
Submission types
Tools track accepts two types of submissions:
- Tool presentation papers (up to 5 pages): describe innovative and original tools addressing technical debt issues or aiming at the management of technical debt. Submitted tool papers will be peer-reviewed and accepted submissions will be published in the conference proceedings.
- Extended abstract (1-2 pages): describe innovative and original initial tools idea for which there is not yet a prototype in order to obtain early feedback. Extended abstracts provide practitioners with an opportunity to showcase a tool-specific perspective. Extended abstracts are not peer-reviewed and will not be published in the conference proceedings.
Suggested content for both types of submissions, the program committee, and chairs will look for: - The alignment to the overarching technical debt theme of the conference. - How the purpose of the tool is addressed and how validation experiences with practitioners have been planned or conducted (if applicable)
Submission process
In HotCRP, on top of specifying the type of submission, indicate how you will participate in the conference session (you may select one or both):
- Panel participant: In the panel discussion we will engage participants and the audience on how the showcased tools help address technical debt challenges.
- Tool demonstration: If you propose to showcase your tool or product from your organization, please let us know your requirements *(such as space, equipment, …). A dedicated demo session will be part of the Tools track.
All accepted papers will also have the possibility to bring a poster during the conference. Papers and extended abstracts must be submitted electronically via the TechDebtConf2022 HotCRP site (https://techdebt22.hotcrp.com/). Select the correct track and paper type on the submission form.
Submissions must be in PDF and conform to the ACM formatting guidelines applied for ICSE 2022. Submissions may not exceed the number of pages specified above (including all text, references, and figures). Purchases of additional pages in the proceedings are not allowed.
Formatting instructions are available at https://www.acm.org/publications/proceedings-template for both LaTeX and Word users.
The official publication date is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM or IEEE Digital Libraries. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of ICSE 2022. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work. Accepted papers must be presented in person at the conference by one of the authors. Accepted submissions will be published as part of the ICSE co-located events proceedings.
Extended Abstracts
Tue 17 MayDisplayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change
10:00 - 11:00 | Opening and Keynote 1 Yuanfang CaiTechnical Papers / Tools Track / Catering at TechDebt room Chair(s): Neil Ernst University of Victoria | ||
10:00 60mKeynote | Keynote: Technical Debt Goes Beyond Technical: Experiences from Multiple Companies. Technical Papers Yuanfang Cai Drexel University | ||
10:00 60mKeynote | Keynote: Technical Debt Goes Beyond Technical: Experiences from Multiple Companies. Technical Papers Yuanfang Cai Drexel University |
12:10 - 12:50 | Social Event - TD TriviaTechnical Papers / Tools Track / Catering at TechDebt room Chair(s): Zadia Codabux University of Saskatchewan, Neil Ernst University of Victoria Tech Debt Trivia Contest: Answers Starting with T or D | ||
12:10 40mSocial Event | Social Event: TD Trivia Technical Papers |
13:00 - 13:50 | |||
13:00 16mTalk | An Architecture Smell Knowledge Base for Managing Architecture Technical Debt Technical Papers | ||
13:16 16mTalk | Sonarlizer Xplorer: a tool to mine Github projects and identify technical debt items using SonarQube Tools Track Diogo Pina University of São Paulo, Alfredo Goldman University of São Paulo, Carolyn Seaman University of Maryland Baltimore County | ||
13:33 16mTalk | Merging Smell Detectors: Evidence on the Agreement of Multiple Tools Tools Track Apostolos Ichtsis University of Macedonia, Nikolaos Mittas International Hellenic University, Apostolos Ampatzoglou University of Macedonia, Alexander Chatzigeorgiou University of Macedonia |
Wed 18 MayDisplayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change
10:00 - 11:00 | Keynote 2Technical Papers / Tools Track / Catering at TechDebt room Chair(s): Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University | ||
10:00 60mKeynote | Keynote: Strategic Implications of Technical Debt Technical Papers Narayan Ramasubbu University of Pittsburgh, USA |
11:10 - 12:00 | Papers Session 3 - TD Impact and PerspectiveTechnical Papers / Tools Track / Catering at TechDebt room | ||
11:10 16mTalk | Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange Technical Papers Felipe Gomes Federal University of Bahia, Eder Pereira dos Santos Federal University of Bahia, Sávio Freire Federal University of Bahia and Federal Institute of Ceará, Manoel Mendonça Federal University of Bahia, Thiago Souto Mendes Federal Institute of Bahia, Rodrigo Spinola Universidade Salvador | ||
11:26 16mTalk | Technical Debt Prioritization: A Developer's Perspective Technical Papers Diogo Pina University of São Paulo, Carolyn Seaman University of Maryland Baltimore County, Alfredo Goldman University of São Paulo | ||
11:43 16mTalk | MultiDimEr : A multi-dimensional bug analyzEr Tools Track Lakmal Silva Blekinge Institute of Technology, Michael Unterkalmsteiner Blekinge Institute of Technology, Krzysztof Wnuk |
12:10 - 12:50 | PanelTechnical Papers / Tools Track / Catering at TechDebt room Chair(s): Neil Ernst University of Victoria, Valentina Lenarduzzi University of Oulu, Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University | ||
12:10 40mPanel | Panel: TD Case Studies Technical Papers Neil Ernst University of Victoria |
13:00 - 14:00 | Papers Session 4 TD Impact and Perspectives IITechnical Papers / Tools Track / Catering at TechDebt room | ||
13:00 20mTalk | Code Red: The Business Impact of Code Quality - A Quantitative Study of 39 Proprietary Production Codebases Technical Papers | ||
13:20 20mTalk | Towards measuring the aggregated debt of Trustworthiness level Technical Papers Imanol Urretavizcaya Tecnalia, Basque Research & Technology Alliance (BRTA), Nuria Quintano Tecnalia, Jabier Martinez Tecnalia | ||
13:40 20mDay closing | Virtual Closing and In Person Details Technical Papers Neil Ernst University of Victoria, Valentina Lenarduzzi University of Oulu, Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University |
Tue 24 MayDisplayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change
09:00 - 09:30 | |||
09:30 - 10:30 | |||
11:00 - 11:30 | |||
11:30 - 12:00 | |||
12:30 - 13:30 | |||